fomapan 400 vs hp5

These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. You can post now and register later. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. It has a unique feel and look. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. 1. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Glad you liked it!The one on the left is the Foma! It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Simon, These are great! Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Some people love it, some hate it. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). Press?? Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Happy shooting! Added additional sample images. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. D-76 is OK. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. ago. Paste as plain text instead, I highly recommend you check it out here. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! I'm open to any dispute. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. November 20, 2019. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. News, Tips & Reviews. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Glad you enjoyed this piece. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Upload or insert images from URL. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. roll of Kentmere 400. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. So this post is very helpful many thanks. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. Learn how your comment data is processed. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. 1. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. You cannot paste images directly. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export. Is that the new Jane Bond? "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. . This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. What a difference! I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. Quote; It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. Display as a link instead, Enter? Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. At any rate, nice shots. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Simon, nice job! Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. totally agree with the article. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. It is a true 400 ISO film. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. However I really wanted to get better negatives. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. Glad you found it useful! However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. Fibonawak 8 mo. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. Go figure. Hi, Simon absolutely lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B&W should look like! Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger 1. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. Thank you Marius! Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Noticeable halation. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Thank you! Your link has been automatically embedded. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. That could be quite a difference. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan.